Nov 26, 2024 8 min read

Self Efficacy: A Better Construct than Confidence

Self-Efficacy: a better construct than confidence.

Confidence is overrated. A more effective, scientifically-grounded approach to improve performance is self-efficacy.

We often hear about the importance of confidence. "Believe in yourself," the advice goes. Although intuitive, it's not as helpful. What exactly is confidence? Is it innate? Or can you work at it? Self-efficacy is a more precise way of understanding confidence.

Imagine having not just the belief that you can succeed, but a deep-seated conviction based on experience, knowledge, and self-awareness. That's self-efficacy. It's the difference between saying "I think I can handle this challenge" and knowing "I have the skills and experience to navigate this situation effectively."

I’ve found self-efficacy more helpful than the often vague notion of “confidence”. More importantly, it provides ways to build it systematically.

In this article, I explore:

  • The key elements of self-efficacy.
  • Its role in leadership
  • How to systematically build self-efficacy

What is Self Efficacy?

Self-efficacy, as defined by Albert Bandura, is the belief in your ability to organize and execute necessary actions to achieve specific outcomes.

Unlike self-esteem, which reflects self-worth, or confidence, which is general and context-free, self-efficacy is precise. It’s a “can-do” belief in the face of defined tasks, challenges, or environments.

You may be confident leading a team, but lack self-efficacy in navigating a financial crisis. This nuance is critical because self-efficacy directly impacts how leaders approach challenges, influencing whether they engage or retreat, persevere or abandon, and ultimately succeed or fail.

A key attribute of self-efficacy is malleability. It’s a dynamic belief system that evolves with experiences, feedback, and reflection. This means you can actively develop it over time, turning it into a resource that grows stronger with use.

Unlike static traits like temperament or personality, self-efficacy thrives on intentional practice, making it an ideal focus for leadership development.

People’s beliefs about their abilities have a profound effect on those abilities. Ability is not a fixed property; there is a huge variability in how you perform. People who have a sense of self-efficacy bounce back from failures; they approach things in terms of how to handle them rather than worrying about what can go wrong.

— Albert Bandura

Self-efficacy is not confidence or self-esteem

Self-efficacy governs how you approach challenges, interpret setbacks, and influence your environments. It differs from confidence in several ways:

  1. Specificity: Unlike broad self-confidence, self-efficacy is task-specific. A leader might have high self-efficacy for strategic planning but lower for public speaking.
  2. Basis in experience: While confidence can be baseless, self-efficacy is typically grounded in past experiences and achievements.
  3. Impact on behavior: High self-efficacy leads to approaching challenges as opportunities to master, not threats to avoid.

Understanding and developing self-efficacy offers a more nuanced approach to leadership development than simply trying to boost general confidence.

The Four Sources of Self-Efficacy

Bandura identified four primary sources of self-efficacy:

  1. Mastery experiences.
  2. Vicarious learning.
  3. Social persuasion (feedback).
  4. Psychological and physiological states.

These sources are interconnected and collectively shape your belief system.

1. Mastery experiences: the backbone of self-efficacy

Personal achievements gained through effort and persistence — or mastery experiences — are the most potent source of self-efficacy. Success in a challenging task provides evidence of our capabilities, reinforcing the belief that we can handle future challenges.

Successfully navigating a high-stakes negotiation builds confidence for future ones. This belief is further solidified if the experience involved overcoming significant obstacles, as the effort required to succeed amplifies the sense of mastery. Easy wins, while gratifying, don’t offer the same enduring reinforcement.

To put it succinctly: do hard things and earn it. Seek opportunities for meaningful achievement and tackle complex challenges to build robust self-efficacy.

However, mastery experiences are a double-edged sword. Just as success strengthens self-efficacy, repeated failure undermines it. Learn to frame failures as temporary setbacks and learning opportunities, not indicators of incompetence.

Reflection is key: analyzing what went wrong and identifying lessons ensures negative experiences contribute to long-term growth.

2. Vicarious learning: the influence of role models

Observing others succeed — especially those similar to ourselves — boosts self-efficacy. Vicarious learning is especially relevant in leadership, where mentorship, modeling, and storytelling are pivotal.

When you see a peer navigate a complex challenge, it provides a blueprint for action. The implied message is, “If they can do it, so can I.”

Relatable role models are more effective than distant success figures. An emerging leader is more likely to draw inspiration from a direct manager than an abstract case study of a Fortune 500 CEO.

Organizations can amplify this effect by highlighting internal success stories. Narratives of leaders who overcame adversity or achieved milestones create a culture of possibility. Role-playing exercises and peer learning enhance vicarious learning by offering firsthand exposure to effective behaviors.

3. Social persuasion: the power of feedback

Encouragement and constructive feedback from others — what Bandura calls social persuasion — significantly influence self-efficacy, especially when coming from trusted and credible sources. Unlike empty praise, effective feedback is specific, actionable, and grounded in reality.

Instead of saying, “You’re a great leader,” a mentor might say, “Your mediation of that conflict showed good emotional intelligence. You turned a divisive situation into a collaborative effort.” Such feedback not only reinforces a leader’s belief but also provides clarity on what behaviors to replicate or modify.

However, feedback has limits. It’s most effective when paired with evidence from mastery experiences or vicarious learning. Encouragement alone can’t create self-efficacy without action or observation.

Leaders must also learn to filter feedback, distinguishing between constructive guidance and unhelpful criticism.

4. Psychological and physiological states: interpreting internal signals

We interpret our physical and emotional states as indicators of our readiness or ability to perform. But this interpretation process varies significantly between individuals.

A racing heart before a public speech, for example, can be seen as a sign of nervousness or as a surge of energy and focus. Learning to manage and reframe these internal signals is essential for building self-efficacy.

Practices like meditation and exercise help regulate emotional states, ensuring you approach challenges with calm and control. Additionally, creating routines that promote rest and recovery lays a strong foundation for maintaining high self-efficacy in high-pressure environments.

Self-efficacy: a cornerstone of effective leadership

Leadership is inherently uncertain and complex. You must make decisions with incomplete information, manage conflicts, and inspire others during turbulent times.

Research shows that self-efficacy contributes to effective leadership in several ways:

  1. Setting and achieving ambitious goals
  2. Demonstrating resilience in adversity
  3. Inspiring and empowering others
  4. Making effective decisions and solving problems
  5. Creating a positive and supportive work environment
  6. Managing stress and promoting well-being

Research also shows a strong relationship between self-efficacy, resilience, and success. Self-efficacy drives resilience and success, while experiences of resilience and success enhance self-efficacy, creating a powerful upward spiral.

Thus self-efficacy serves as an anchor, enabling you to maintain clarity and agency amidst chaos. It’s not just a psychological boost; it’s the engine driving action, resilience, and sustained performance. Without it, even competent leaders can falter under pressure.

Strategies for building self-efficacy

Given the research findings on self-efficacy:

  • Leadership development programs should prioritize mastery experiences over theoretical knowledge.
  • Mentorship should focus on modeling specific behaviors rather than general advice.
  • Feedback systems should be redesigned to reinforce task-specific capabilities rather than broad personality assessments.

What follows are ways to systematically increase self-efficacy. Work with a coach, peer, or mentor to practice these consistently over the long-term. This applies to both leaders and when working with others.

1. Engineer mastery experiences

  • Gradual exposure. Introduce yourself to challenges incrementally. For instance, a leader anxious about public speaking might start by presenting to small, familiar groups before addressing larger audiences.
  • Use a small wins approach. Begin with “low-risk, high-reward” tasks to create early wins, which serve as proof of capability. A new leader might lead a short-term project or facilitate a meeting before taking on larger responsibilities. Highlight the progression of difficulty to make growth tangible, including dashboards for improvements or personal tracking tools for skill development.
  • Reflect and debrief on wins and losses. Use structured retrospectives to extract lessons. Questions like “What went well? What could be improved? What skills were key to success?” help identify replicable strategies and areas for growth. Document these reflections to build a personal “playbook.” Use tools like the Johari Window and the Ladder of Inference to identify your blindspots.
  • Utilize failure scaffolding. Create environments where the downside of failure is minimized (e.g., simulations, pilot projects, coaching). Focus on experimenting with new behaviors. Gradually increase the complexity of challenges.

2. Emphasize vicarious learning

  • Choose role models wisely. Select mentors or role models with relatable paths or struggles. An introverted leader observing another introvert excel in public speaking builds both belief and strategy for improvement. This increases the transferability of skills.
  • Shadowing other leaders. Find opportunities to observe seasoned individuals. Watching how they handle ambiguity, resolve conflicts, or inspire teams offers a practical education. Pair observation with follow-up discussions to unpack insights.
  • Reverse mentoring. Senior leaders can learn from younger team members adept at navigating emerging technologies or new approaches. This expands the leader’s toolkit while showing that learning is a continuous, reciprocal process.
  • Parallel task practice. Create low-stakes environments to practice critical skills, like mock negotiations or decision-making scenarios. Feedback loops ensure skill refinement before real-world application. They are also a key aspect of double-loop learning.

3. Enhance social persuasion (feedback)

  • Targeted feedback. For effective constructive feedback, tie it to observable behaviors and outcomes (e.g., “Your ability to synthesize diverse perspectives in the meeting helped drive alignment”). Specificity strengthens belief in repeatable capabilities.
  • Normalize developmental feedback. Shift the narrative to emphasize growth over judgment. Use language that frames challenges as opportunities (e.g., “This is an area where you’re gaining strength” instead of “This is a weakness”).
  • Leverage group affirmation. Spotlight team achievements in forums for peer recognition. This reinforces mutual confidence and collective efficacy.

4. Optimize physiological and emotional states

  • Reframe stress. Use analogies to reinterpret signals. For example, “Like an athlete before a game, my body is gearing up for peak performance”. Learn to link physiological arousal to readiness instead of fear.
  • Micro-recovery rituals. Develop recovery practices tailored to your needs, like quick breathing exercises or a short walk before high-pressure moments. Well-practiced rituals create a buffer against burnout and maintain focus.
  • Create psychological safety. Build trust by increasing your self-disclosure. Admitting mistakes and uncertainties as a leader within reason. When team members feel safe, they model this behavior, reinforcing a culture of learning and experimentation.

5. Practice cognitive flexibility

  • Cognitive reframing. Learn to shift negative thoughts by challenging their validity and replacing them with action-oriented alternatives. For instance, “I failed” becomes “This setback taught me X, which I’ll use next time.” Stay alert to cognitive distortions that can derail you, and build your cognitive flexibility.
  • Narrative rewriting. Revisit your leadership journey to identify inflection points where resilience and capability emerged from challenging assignments. Retelling these stories strengthens belief in your ability to handle future challenges.
  • Future anchoring. Connect current actions to future impacts. For instance, by seeking feedback from diverse team members today, you’re developing inclusive leadership skills crucial for leading cross-functional projects next year. This broadens your perspective, linking today’s effort to long-term gains.

Self-efficacy goes beyond the simplistic notion of "confidence" in leadership discourse. It's a nuanced, context-specific framework for developing leadership capabilities.

It challenges the assumption that effective leadership stems from innate traits or charisma. Instead, it posits that effectiveness can be cultivated through deliberate practice and reflection.

Self-efficacy views leadership not from a position of unwavering confidence, but as a journey of continuous self-discovery and deliberate skill-building.

Sources

  1. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control.
  2. Luthans, F. (2010). Organizational Behavior: An Evidence-Based Approach.
  3. Luthans, F., Avolio, B. J., Avey, J. B., & Norman, S. M. (2007). Positive psychological capital: Measurement and relationship with performance and satisfaction. Personnel Psychology, 60(3), 541–572.
  4. Clough, P., & Strycharczyk, D. (2012). Developing Mental Toughness: Improving performance, wellbeing and positive behaviour.
  5. Ferrari, M., & Sternberg, R. J. (1998). Self-awareness: Its nature and development.
  6. Heifetz, R. A., & Laurie, D. L. (2001). The Work of Leadership. HBR.
  7. Kayes, A., & Kayes, D. C. (2011). The Learning Advantage: Six Practices of Learning-Directed Leadership.
  8. Kilburg, R. R. (1991). Executive wisdom.
  9. Peltier, B. (2010). The Psychology of Executive Coaching: Theory and Application.
Sheril Mathews
I am an executive/leadership coach. Before LS, I worked for 20 years in corporate America in various technical & leadership roles. Have feedback? You can reach me at sheril@leadingsapiens.com.
Table of Contents
Great! You’ve successfully signed up.
Welcome back! You've successfully signed in.
You've successfully subscribed to Leading Sapiens.
Your link has expired.
Success! Check your email for magic link to sign-in.
Success! Your billing info has been updated.
Your billing was not updated.